|
 |
“Peanut Gallery” Editors InterviewE. Mitchell (MITCHELL!!) of The Seattle Post-Intelligencer’s “Film Hound” blog interviews Robert G. Weiner and Shelley E. Barba, the editors of In the Peanut Gallery With Mystery Science 3000: Essays on Film, Fandom, Technology and the Culture of Riffing.
5 Replies to ““Peanut Gallery” Editors Interview”Commenting at Satellite News
We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide an "Ignore" button ( Comments are closed. |
|
Satellite News is a fan site for the Mystery Science Theater 3000 television and Netflix series. It is an independent publication written and compiled by Chris Cornell (msampo@aol.com) and Brian Henry (erhardt4@aol.com). Satellite of Love, LLC does not maintain this web site, nor is it responsible for this site's content.
All content posted on Satellite News is copyright © 2024 by Chris Cornell and Brian Henry, except where otherwise noted. This Date in MSTory is written and compiled by Steve Finley, Chris Cornell and Brian Henry. Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved. Please do not reproduce This Date in MSTory items in any form without express written permission from the authors. Items of MST3K news may be duplicated or reposted, as long as Satellite News is cited as the source. The views and opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of Satellite of Love, LLC. No warranty is expressed or implied that the information given herein is completely accurate, and in fact this information can and will change at any time. So there. Mystery Science Theater 3000, its characters and situations are copyrights and trademarks of Satellite of Love, LLC. Banner image created by Larry Lee Moniz. |
|
) to help our users cope with "trolls" and other commenters whom they find annoying. Go to our
Thanks Sampo! Film Hound’s favorite mst3k episode? Mitchell! -E. Mitchell
That’s a terrible interview. Only the first and the last question are about the book proper. I understand the need for fluff questions “whats your favourite this or that”, but I would hardly consider this an interview that brings to light anything meaningful.
What was the process like getting the submissions?
Reaching out the the show’s creators, what was that like?
Reactions to the book?
Editing process?
Timelines it took to put together?
Advice on publishing?
Thoughts of a follow up book?
How well is the book doing?
Thoughts on individual essays?
Funny anctedotes about compiling the work?
etc..etc..etc…
I’ve really enjoyed the book. It definitely offers a few different perspectives than I had thought about. The interiew is fine, although some of nick’s (#2) questions would have been great to read the answers to. I believe everyone had a chance to offer suggestions for questions over on the Discussion Board.
Sorry #2, it’s an entertainment site, if you want info on submissions, timelines and editing you’ll have to wait for an interview at a publishing blog. Thoughts on individual essays? Mine was the best! :-) Glad you like the book #3.
@#4 – last time I checked the Seattle PI was a newspaper. At least when I lived near Seattle it was.
Regardless, it seemed to be a wasted opportunity to learn something meaningful about
1 – Rob
2 – Shelley
3 – the book
@Criswell – what essay is yours? At this years PCA/ACA conference Mcfarland had a few copies for sale at their booth – and they all sold out there. So the book is circulating (like the taaaaaapes)