Interview with Joel“Creative Loafing Atlanta” has a short interview with Joel, in advance of next weekend’s Cinematic Titanic shows.
17 Replies to “Interview with Joel”Commenting at Satellite News
We are determined to encourage thoughtful discussion, so please be respectful to others. We also provide an "Ignore" button () to help our users cope with "trolls" and other commenters whom they find annoying. Go to our Commenting Guidelines page for more details, including how to report offensive and spam commenting. Comments are closed. |
|
Satellite News is a fan site for the Mystery Science Theater 3000 television and Netflix series. It is an independent publication written and compiled by Chris Cornell (msampo@aol.com) and Brian Henry (erhardt4@aol.com). Satellite of Love, LLC does not maintain this web site, nor is it responsible for this site's content.
All content posted on Satellite News is copyright © 2024 by Chris Cornell and Brian Henry, except where otherwise noted. This Date in MSTory is written and compiled by Steve Finley, Chris Cornell and Brian Henry. Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved. Please do not reproduce This Date in MSTory items in any form without express written permission from the authors. Items of MST3K news may be duplicated or reposted, as long as Satellite News is cited as the source. The views and opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of Satellite of Love, LLC. No warranty is expressed or implied that the information given herein is completely accurate, and in fact this information can and will change at any time. So there. Mystery Science Theater 3000, its characters and situations are copyrights and trademarks of Satellite of Love, LLC. Banner image created by Larry Lee Moniz. |
HA! Nice to see Joel’s reaction to the Jaws Rifftrax was basically the same as mine. That guy…he knows where its at.
0 likes
Yay…we here in atlanta and Cineprov! cant’ wait to see the Cinematic Titanic show even though it probably means no one will show up for our mocking of Grease on the 15th :cry:
http://WWW.Cineprov.com if you’re in atlanta and wanna see the winners of best live comedy in atlanta mock bad movies
0 likes
Jaws is Jaws, but that’s not “MST3K.”
Umm, I think they meant the riffing part, Joel. :razz: :wink:
0 likes
Yeah! Rock on, Joel!
0 likes
I’m a little concerned about Joel’s RiffTrax Jaws comment. Isn’t that the way flame wars really catch fire? I still say we are fortunate there are two groups giving us this stuff. As long as the quality is there more can be better.
0 likes
Yeah, I was a little surprised by Joel’s comment as well. You wouldn’t ever catch the Rifftrax guys ever saying anything negative about Joel’s work publicly.
0 likes
Also another of Joel’s comment’s irked me: “I did notice that after we started, they started doing older, “MST3K”-type movies.”
Most (all?) of those- Reefer Madness, House on Haunted Hill, Carnival of Souls, etc.- were originally done by Mike Nelson solo years before Cinematic Titanic started.
0 likes
But certainly, one could make the argument that the decision to re-release the Legend films as three-riffer editions was, in part, a direct response to CT’s success with more “MST3K” style content.
I think Joel gets to say whatever he wants. It’s his baby, and if he thinks it’s odd to use “MST3K” and “Jaws” in the same sentence (which it is), then he has more than a right to make his opinion known.
I like both projects. I buy most of what both camps sell, and it’s great to have two teams of super-funny people selling riff-based entertainment. Both sides have their flaws, but really, it’s an embarrassment of riches (riffage?)
0 likes
I agree- it’s a GREAT time to be a MSTie. Too much is better than not enough, and it’s KILLING me I’m too broke to buy more stuff from both camps…
0 likes
Didn’t Rifftrax start doing shorts in earnest after CT was announced? That might be what Joel was referencing. As for the Jaws comment, I kind of get what he meant, but it could use some clarification.
0 likes
Actually, as far as I remember, Rifftrax started doing more bigger budget films (along with an increase in shorts) after CT came out. It wasn’t until the begining of this year that I noticed them getting back to the older films.
0 likes
They did jump right in with Star Wars Holiday Special right when people were speculating whether that would be CT’s first film.
0 likes
@oddstock : To be fair, I think the reason they did that one was also one of the big reasons that rumor existed – because a lot of people wanted that one riffed. I doubt it was a calculated attempt to scoop Cinematic Titanic.
0 likes
#8
My original theory for re-working the Legend films solo riffing into three riffer editions was it was probably no more than a cheap ploy to increase sales of the Legend discs as well as new RiffTrax MP3 sales with minimal amount of writing. Basically I saw it as an attempt to be lazy as opposed to muscling in Cinematic Titanic territory.
Then the release of the RiffTrax DVD’s of the Legend Films releases so soon on the heals of the 3 Riffer MP3 seems to shoot down half of my theory. Still I don’t think RiffTrax updating previous material constitutes trying to muscle in on Cinematic Titanics “old movie turf.”
0 likes
@GersonK: right, but regardless of whether it was a calculated attempt or not, isn’t the point more about perception/how it came across?
0 likes
#12 I don’t see how the Star Wars Holiday Special could have been Cinematic Titanic’s first (or any) film. Since CT does DVD’s only there is no way they would have got that one licensed.
RiffTrax and their MP3’s only is the only way that title gets done.
0 likes
#16 You’re right, it couldn’t have. But I remember people speculated wildly about it at the time because the title of the first CT release was a secret, because it was advertised to be a particularly bad film, because it would be released in time for X-mas, and because it would be performed at ILM. The ILM factor alone made it seem possible. But again, I mentioned it because of how things looked – not because of how things were. The timing of the RT release was a wild coincidence which seemed a little too coincidental in a way. Emphasis on the word ‘seemed’. Just an observation, not trying to stir things up.
0 likes